🔗 Share this article

Turns out Ruben Amorim was able to withstand defeat by Grimsby. Survive an important European final against one of the worst Spurs sides in living memory. He could survive home defeats against domestic rivals, finishing 15th, the tactical inflexibility, squandering the team's most promising academy products, the 32% win rate, labeling his team the worst the club has ever seen. Yet, there existed one adversary with whom Ruben Amorim was not permitted to tango. You come at Jason Wilcox, and you best not miss.

Regrettably, like many a top-flight defender in Blackburn’s title-winning 1994-95 season, the coach came at the executive and appears to have failed. The most casual observer will notice the irony here: a coach who often railed his squad for losing one-on-one duels crumbling in the face of the white heat and animal charisma of one of the Premier League’s most intimidating football executives.

And frankly, this entire bruising episode seems to paint Jason Wilcox in a different perspective. It may have been tempting, given his brief stint of experience at Southampton, to regard him as merely a functionary within the club's structure: an individual who owed his position largely to his friendship with his former boss a fellow executive rather than any demonstrable skill. How wrong we all were. In brilliantly outmanoeuvring the club's celebrated head coach, just as he bested the unfortunate a previous executive before him, he has demonstrated as one of football's strategic masterminds: a strategic mind that the club's competitors are now justifiably concerned.

The Tactical Clash Regarding Formation and Ideology

To illustrate, it was Jason Wilcox who having been part of the hierarchy that appointed the 3-4-3 fundamentalist the coach in the first place, was instrumental in trying to persuade Amorim to abandon his favored 3-4-3. Unsurprisingly, these pleas were resisted. However, these judgements carry more weight when delivered from the mouth of a man the impeccable football pedigree he possesses, holder of international appearances and a role in a championship team decades past.

Maybe eventually Jason Wilcox might agree to explain his thought processes publicly. Maybe one day questions may arise regarding why the coach is walking away with a full payout, without any compensation reduction clause in place. The director speaks rarely publicly, for excellent reasons. The real thinkers of this sport – individuals such as him – simply operate on a plane exceeding our prosaic understanding. If he ever did speak, most likely all we would hear is a series of high-frequency signals and four-dimensional whirring. Wanting is not quite the same as being prepared to receive.

An Ultimate Authority In the Throne

But of course, by focusing our attention on the sporting director we overlook the true genius behind the club's current leadership. The director is, in reality, merely executing the commands of his ultimate line manager Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who privately has made very clear his preference for a four-man defense. It is reported, Ratcliffe has also proposed playing Bryan Mbeumo as a right wing-back. Ratcliffe is keen for the club to embrace analytics and metrics. According to ESPN, in an executive meeting early in his investment, he declared that the team's approach to football “shall be determined by this group”.

Ultimately, Ratcliffe is an expert in this technical football matters, drawing from his previous experience in industry and yachting. Most importantly he is incredibly rich, and it is known, the wealthy are superior: more insightful, sagacious, more tactically astute, fundamentally superior. Who else could one trust to manage a strategic plan of austerity, the construction of a new stadium that looks similar to an abstract design, the acquisition of a new striker?

The Modern Football Order: Directors Over Coaches

This represents a shift that is becoming prevalent in top-tier football. Historically, teams mistakenly entrusted big footballing decisions to subordinate staff such as coaches, talent spotters – players themselves. Perhaps it was once possible for an up-and-coming, visionary coach with ideas and drive to join a club and implement their plan supported to fruition. Yet how many companies have these guys established? How many mass redundancies have they overseen? Far preferable to invest genuine authority where it rightly belongs: the executive class, the casually dressed executives, the individuals with the jaw-dropping LinkedIn profiles. Better by far to determine the tactics by the directors and hire a coach who will adapt their offering accordingly. If managers were formerly chefs, they are now more like Deliveroo drivers: not creating the food, but still ultimately answerable if it arrives poorly or fails of the box.

In the meantime, a coach's role has become not about defining the vision and more about selling it: the receptionist of the operation, the public face for a club they have minimal power to influence. Enzo Maresca takes a squad of literal children into Europe and secures domestic cups, and essentially is dismissed for speaking out. A manager at Celtic finds his reputation ruined while those individuals who hired him live to blunder indefinitely.

The Neoliberal Game: Accountability for the Coaches

And perhaps on some microcosmic level this is simply neoliberalism in action: the rise of a privileged overclass who are infallible, whose choices remain untouchable, whose errors can always be resolved by sacking without justification. Hire the system coach and then fire him for using too much that system. Bring in the process guy and later discard them for taking too long. And most importantly show gratitude; for the incremental increases in ticket costs, for your new player acquisitions, for the fact that the grownups – regardless of their expertise – remain in control.